We are each likely familiar with the concepts of
past, present, and future. It is not a leap to
consider that our future is our potential. In fact,
this is a better way to view our future. Rather than
a stagnant unknown and useless projection, we are
better able to act today to affect our future and
thus or potential. We can also consider our past,
present, and potential eras as the industrial era,
the informational era, and the environmental era.
Industrial, Informational, and Environmental Eras
We hear about sweeping changes,
systemic reformation, and paradigm shifts. Our world
has been changing, reforming, and shifting
throughout the ages; and it has evolved in ways that
must in turn affect the way we live and serve within
it. This oneness with the world is potentially at
the heart of how we envision the coming era. Many
minds have put thought to this. I postulate as well
that there are
many differences between the past, present, and
potential eras that I consider are the industrial
era, the informational era, and the environmental
era.
According to Reigeluth (1999), key markers
characterize the industrial and informational ages.
Examining what is known about these eras, we are
then able to imagine the potential era. Current
trends that are increasingly environmental in nature
are the emerging markers. But how do we define this
emerging era? Looking at what is known about the two
points in time (past and present), we are able to
triangulate and plot a third point, comprising the
environmental era. We won’t be abandoning our past
and present eras in moving toward our potential era,
but rather we will operate in tandem with all three
eras, putting each to its highest and best use.
Another way
to understand the past, present, and potential eras
is to ask and answer:
|
Q.
What has happened?
A.
Industrial Era |
Q.
What is happening?
A.
Informational Era |
Q.
What will happen?
A.
Environmental Era |
Breaking down
these three eras we can examine them in terms of
paradigms or according to certain structures. The
first two eras are already defined as adapted
somewhat from
Reigeluth's (1999) "key markers." We can then make
certain assumptions about the emerging environmental
era.
How do we operate and relate in these three eras?
The following table
has been
organized by operational and relational components.
|
Era
Paradigms and Domains |
Industrial Era
Past |
Informational Era
Present |
Environmental Era
Potential |
| |
Operational |
|
Condition |
Standardization |
Customization |
Specialization |
|
Orientation |
Parts |
Process |
People |
|
System |
Compartmental
(segmented
system) |
Holistic
(whole
system) |
Universal
(survival system) |
|
Focus |
Business |
Customer |
Society |
|
Control |
Obsolescence |
Quality |
Longevity |
|
Output |
Production
(make
more) |
Consumption
(use
more) |
Conservation
(save
more) |
| |
Relational |
|
Power |
Autocratic
(central
responsibility) |
Shared
(common responsibility) |
Supportive
(assistive
responsibility) |
|
Structure |
Administrative |
Competitive |
Collaborative |
|
Dependence |
Dependent |
Independent |
Codependent |
|
Interaction |
Adversarial |
Cooperative |
Participatory |
|
Behavioral |
Conformity
(go
along with) |
Diversity
(go
away from) |
Unity
(go
together in) |
|
Relational |
Directing
(forcing
relationships) |
Networking
(finding
relationships) |
Maintaining
(forging
relationships) |
Sources
Reigeluth, C. M.(1999). Instructional design
theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional
theory. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers.